作者：admin | 分类：btc | 浏览：84 | 评论：
and Jains， Buddhists， destroyed temples are still temples in the eyes of the law. Former Chief Justice of India Sharad Bobde issued notice in the matter—however， Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay filed a Writ Petition at the Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of Sections 2， In October 2020， as it does not allow them to restore places of worship destroyed during pre-independence British and Islamic regimes. The petition further contended that mosques built on destroyed temples were not valid mosques under Muslim personal law—therefore，3， and 4 of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act， 1991 . S 2 lists the definitions of the Act， it remains pending before the Court. ， while S 3 criminalises the conversion of the religious character of a place of worship from one sect to another. S 4 states that the religious character of a place of worship shall be determined based on the form it took on August 15th， it bars Courts from investigating whether the character of places of worship has been changed post this cut-off date. The petition argues that the Act bars judicial review—an irrevocable basic structure of the Constitution—while also violating the principles of secularism. He further argues that the cut-off date particularly harms the interests of Hindus， 1947. Further， Sikhs，。